Hello — the Dynamics 365 community, live

New jobs, articles and questions as they happen. Join free to say hello and start earning points.

Discussion 16 Jul +10 pts

How to put agents to work without breaking what already runs the business?

Two years ago, Copilot in Dynamics 365 was essentially a helpful colleague who could summarize a record or draft an email. The 2026 release wave 1 marks the point where that changed. Microsoft now ships agents across Sales, Customer Service, Finance and Supply Chain that do not simply answer questions. They take a business goal expressed in plain language, break it into concrete steps, and carry those steps out inside the system. 

Two years ago, Copilot in Dynamics 365 was essentially a helpful colleague who could summarize a record or draft an email. The 2026 release wave 1 marks the point where that changed. Microsoft now ships agents across Sales, Customer Service, Finance and Supply Chain that do not simply answer questions. They take a business goal expressed in plain language, break it into concrete steps, and carry those steps out inside the system. 


The clearest example is the Contact Center, which Microsoft is turning into a fully agentic environment. Cases get triaged, routed, drafted and in many instances resolved before a human ever opens them. Containment rates, the share of inquiries handled entirely without human involvement, have become a headline metric in customer service projects. On the finance side, the new autonomous Payflow Agent takes over payment processing tasks that used to consume hours of accounts payable time every week.


Anyone who has sat through a Dynamics implementation knows the traditional shape of the work: requirements, configuration, data migration, training, support. Agents add a layer that behaves differently from anything consultants have deployed before. An agent is not a workflow. It does not follow a fixed path, and its behavior depends on the quality of the data and knowledge it can reach. 


That has practical consequences. Data hygiene, long treated as a cleanup task to squeeze in before migration weekend, is now a precondition for the headline features working at all. An agent drafting customer responses from a knowledge base full of outdated articles will confidently produce outdated answers. Teams that skipped the unglamorous work of curating their content are discovering that the bill has arrived. 


Scoping also changes. Clients increasingly arrive with expectations set by consumer AI tools and assume the same fluency will appear in their ERP on day one. Part of the consultant's job in 2026 is expectation management: being clear about what agents do well today, where they still need human review, and which processes are genuinely ready to hand over. 

322 Read more
Like 0 comments
Discussion 9 Mar

Are you using Microsoft Copilot or other AI tools?

I did some training for Copilot, but have not been using it. I want to know if it is better compared to other AI tools

416 Read more
Like 2 comments
S
Synoptek LLC 4w ago
Good question and the honest answer is that it's less "Copilot vs. other AI tools" and more "different jobs." Where Copilot wins is context. Because it's grounded in your own F&O data, Dataverse and M365 content, and it inherits your security roles, it can summarise a vendor record, explain a variance, or draft a customer follow-up using your actual numbers. A general-purpose chatbot can't do that unless you paste the data in yourself which most finance teams shouldn't be doing anyway. Where general tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini) still win is open-ended reasoning: writing documentation, drafting policies, explaining an accounting treatment, cleaning up a spec before you hand it to a developer. No ERP context needed, and no licence per user. If you did the training but haven't used it, my suggestion would be to pick one repetitive process rather than trying it broadly. The ones that tend to pay off fastest in F&O: - Embedded summaries on records, workspaces and forms low risk, immediate time saving - Vendor invoice capture and matching - Collections and customer communications - Bank reconciliation matching suggestions - Copilot in Excel/Teams/Outlook on the M365 side, which people often underrate The 2026 release wave 1 stuff is pushing further into agents that can actually run multi-step processes with human approval, so it's worth watching even if you're not ready today. Two caveats from experience: output quality tracks your master data quality very closely, so if your vendor or customer records are messy you'll be disappointed. And most failed rollouts we see aren't technical they're adoption. People need to be shown it inside their actual daily work, not in a training session. Full disclosure, I work at Synoptek (we're a managed IT services provider), so I see this from both sides we use Copilot internally across our own marketing, service desk and reporting workflows, and we also help clients with the readiness side before they turn it on: permissions and data-governance cleanup, identifying which processes are actually worth automating, and then adoption support afterwards. The readiness part is boring but it's usually what separates the deployments that stick from the ones that quietly get abandoned. Happy to share more detail on any of the specific use cases if useful.
F
Former member 1w ago
Microsoft Copilot

New here?

Dynamics Hub is where D365 consultants and the companies that need them actually talk to each other. Jobs are free, the community is open, and the daily challenges are dangerously addictive.

Join free Sign in

Why sign in?

See who's winning the daily challenges, ask questions with your name on them, and get a feed that knows what you care about.